Psychiatrists and
Psychologists debate medication. 
| Site Map * Disclaimer * Site Search * Index * Piper Creations https://thepiedpiper.tripod.com/psyc1.htm 
 All Words property of original owners unless otherwise
  noted     From the medication debate that psychologists and
  psychiatrist have had,   to ADD and ADHD - I ask who will have the
  children?     Posted on 14 Oct 2000     American Psychological Association  Prescription Privileges Fact Sheet:  http://www.apa.org/apags/prescrip.html  What Students Should Know About The APA’s
  Pursuit Of Prescription Privileges For Psychologists    
  (RxP)    American Psychiatric Society  http://www.psych.org/libr_publ/su_010299.html.
   January/February 1999     THE GREAT PSYCHOLOGY PRESCRIPTION DEBATE
   http://psychcentral.com/archives/n071498.htm    Bitter pill: Psychologists split over right
  to prescribe  http://www.thecitizen.com/national/970817/1074106.html
   Sunday 17 August 1997    Prescription Privileges Task Force
  Committee Reports 1997 by Stephen E. Berger, Ph.D., ABPP, FAClinP,
  FPPR    Links continue
  at 09Oct2000  The next links
  seem to show that school medication could become standardized and made into a
  law.   Speculation: 
  At that time the school nurse or principal could recommend the child be
  medicated.  The child or parents would not have legal recourse, and if a
  teacher did not agree, the teacher could be replaced.         I posted this on 13 Oct 2000  this series
  of articles will be called Nature, Nurture or CNS  The over all themes of these articles are that “Survival
  of the Fittest” leads to a dark age in education.  Each time the ideas of education that are based on honor, and
  allow someone to fall (like a child learning to walk) get to the point that they
  become laws that anyone should know the honor can get lost in sportsmanship
  (rules) and the sportsmanship in laws at that time it looks as if people go
  looking for the honor again by saying that people do not have ethics. With
  humans being at the mercy of bacteria and fungus it could get to the point of
  our being at savage level to be able to have enough of an “SurvivaL Instict”
  or “Survival Index” to be able to combat the different diseases.  As the citations from my rough draft shows
  https://thepiedpiper.tripod.com/Book1/CNS1.htm,
  many pathogens have (increasingly) taken hold these last 15 years.  When items like fungal spores are in the
  air, even if you were to have a clean room environment, with every air
  scrubber and sound waves that were capable of killing all air born
  microorganisms, it seems as if the hydroponics would eventually become
  contaminated.  The use of antibiotics
  only seems to allow the pathogens to gain a greater hold over the beneficial
  bacteria that plants, animals, and humans need to survive.   Part 1 A look into mental and genetic ideas and the
  history of those ideas from their historical background to present day
  beliefs.  Does the Domnici-Kennedy
  bill relating to mental health have validity?  Not written yet: Part 2.  Will explore the beliefs of the Holocaust
  and equate the way the Slavs were treated to what happened to the Black
  American during the American Civil War. 
  New York during the Civil War was city that had limited indoor
  plumbing; one outhouse per tenant building was the rule.  Lincoln was not offering the Southern
  States enough money to take all the immigrants and it seems as if many blamed
  the slaves for being the reason that the Southern States did not need those
  immigrants.  The Civil War flag is not
  a symbol of Slavery or a hate item, it is a historical reminder of the fact
  that if Lincoln had not been assassinated the Civil War probably would not
  have continued, since a common ground could have been worked out.  Hitler supported blonde-haired people
  because he wanted human white lab rats that could be rounded up; the idea
  that was put out that they were genetically mentally inferior was erroneous.   Part 3 Will explore the ideas of Genetically Modified items in the light of https://thepiedpiper.tripod.com/Book1/CNS1.htm As items evolve it seems that they can become fragile. Intelligence can make it were someone does not necessarily want to have physical fights anymore. We seem to be a byproduct of sexual bacteria, and our food is digested in our intestinal tracts by bacteria that seems to eat other bacteria. Our bodies are based on the BALANCE of stress, when that stress is taken away by things like Goals 2000, outcome based education to much TV is it possible that we look for that stress in disagreements or food? To allow Drugs to become the rule in schools when there is still so much to learn about the way that the Earth works, and how humans work would be wrong. To make it were doctors, psychiatrists, psychologists, judges, lawyers, and parents were not considered because there is a law were if any child act strange they are stuck on a drug. Who will own the children then? Even if someone were to have all the diamonds, gold, money and every other symbol in the world where are there assets? In our diversity of thinking, if someone were to have control of all intellectual properties rights would they ever want to consider ideas like these that are saying that a world wide monopoly will lead to a overall loss of intellectual motivation? 
 Start of - Nature, Nurture or CNS There has been a controversy about who can prescribe drugs; Psychiatrists (who have a MD), or Psychologists (who is not a MD-but has more mental philosophical training), but there are two other more intensive degrees one of these is a neural psychiatrist and the other is psychological degree that takes about 10 years to get. For now I will only be referring to the first two degrees. 
 Currently there are several civil law suits against Ritalin [ A Diagnosis Excess? A Lawsuit Alleges Attention Deficit Disorder Is Over-Diagnosed http://www.abcnews.go.com/sections/living/DailyNews/ritalin_lawsuit0808.html N E W Y O R K, Aug. 9 — Nestor Sosa spent three years and $40,000 fighting to get his son off Ritalin.] The news articles that I have seen do not mention food reactions, or reactions to chemicals as reasons for children acting out. Toxic Chemicals Linked to Health Problems in Children  So, as you can see from a small portion of this law - Restrictions on use of human subjects for testing of chemical or biological agents http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/50/1520a.html (b) Exceptions it appears that chemical testing is "completely" legal if it is (read the next 3 lines) 
 Laws like this would make it legal for large (corporation) farms to
  have as much chemical run off, as they like.  Some of these
  Corporate farms are not even owned by people that live in the county they are
  in. For at least the last 15 years, red tides have been getting larger and more frequent. The effects of these red tides are being felt worldwide. Science News Jan 30, 1999 Sea life does not normally have a problem with cancers yet something is causing problems for sea life and the animals that depend on it. Arctic Wildlife Wounded and
  Scarred by Pollution  more links like these are at https://thepiedpiper.tripod.com/Book1/CNS1.htm By this time, I started looking for laws and what the laws could be based on. CHEMISTRY OF H (MUSTARD) Check out the reference to past President Nixon in the next article. This shows that the same research seemed to be going on. The name went from biological research to "toxin research". I. HISTORY OF BIOLOGICAL
  WARFARE USAMRIID Chapter - II - The Hitler
  Project By now I was wondering why there were so few laws against chemical and it seems as if there should be more news about them. If this much was happening to life in the water, certainly human had to be effected, so I went looking for problems with human health. Science Reference Section     Science and
  Technology Division     Library of Congress ATTENTION DEFICIT-HYPERACTIVITY 
 If ADHD was such a problem it seemed as if there should be some organization that helped these people. There was but CHADD http://www.chadd.org/facts/add_facts06.htm (I accessed this link on Sept 30, 2000) This page implies that ADHD is a mystery disorder/disease, and has a list of what they consider reliable places to get information in which they list themselves as "national disorder/disease-specific organizations (such as CHADD)" 
 Therefore, I went looking for other possible problems. It would seem as if psychiatrists and psychologists will be able to resolve the medication problem soon, neither one will be consulted. It seems as if anyone will be able to be accused of mental problems soon, if this goes through. The other question I thought of; will lawyers be needed if there is a law defining mental disorder that can be ruled on by a judge, without getting an evaluation from the family professional, where would individual rights be in a case like this? [Insanity Pleas from the City Limits: New York’s Urban Affairs News Magazine http://www.cityliomits.org/archives/0005davis.htm] So, if ADHD is a national
  disorder/disease problem that could eventually be ruled on by teachers,
  judges, or possibly your next-door neighbor, will professionals be needed, or
  even desired?     The problem that I have with a
  personality diagnosis like ADD or ADHD is the foundation that they seem to be
  based on.  To see what was happening and
  what was happening to people at that time here is a short time line.   1665 Great Plague of London 1668 (Italian) Francesco Redi
  - disproved “Spontaneous Generation” 1798 French Rev Malthus –
  theory of surplus population 1846-1851 Irish Potato Famine
  – weird weather conditions and starvation 1850 (France) Louis Pasteur
  disproves “Spontaneous Generation” 1859 Charles Darwin – supports
  theory of “Survival of the Fittest” 1856-1939 Sigmound Freud –
  Penis Envy and Female Inferiority    The next link that warranted
  visiting was http://www.trufax.org/avoid/nazi.html.  This link detailed how the ideas of  “Survival of the Fittest”
  seems to be the foundation of the Soviets. 
  Many think of these ideas as Darwin’s (published about 1859) and this
  type of idea seems to have taken off world wide about that time.  What many do not realize is that the idea
  of a population being a liability started with 1798 with Malthus and Darwin’s
  publications seemed to justify a countries population being a potential
  liability.    How could this have happened? 
  In 1668 that an Italian scientist, Francesco Redi disproved
  “Spontaneous Generation”, which is the idea that life comes from non-orgaic
  material.  This idea was still being
  debated in France until Louis Pasteur (1822-1899) found out that most
  infectious diseases are caused by germs, known as the "germ theory of
  disease".  An experiment in 1850
  proved to Pasteur that    Pasteur "Never will the
  doctrine of spontaneous generation recover from the mortal blow of this
  simple experiment. No, there is now no circumstance known in which it can be
  affirmed that microscopic beings came into the world without germs, without
  parents similar to themselves." http://www.louisville.edu/library/ekstrom/special/pasteur/cohn.html  
 I posted these on 09 Oct 2000 Cloning teams cross pig and human
  DNA     October 8 2000   United States Code  CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL WARFARE PROGRAM
  -  Chemical Testing on Civilian Populations http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/50/1520a.html    Four Principals For Curtailing The Proliferation Of Biological And
  Chemical Arms   by Baker Spring Aug 19,1991    http://www.heritage.org/library/archives/backgrounder/bg844.html   History Of Biological Warfare   http://www.gulfwarvets.com/biowar.htm   The Psycho /Scarecrow Says BOO!      http://www.mouthmag.com/number60/psychonews.htm Insanity Pleas from the City Limits: New York’s Urban Affairs News
  Magazine http://www.cityliomits.org/archives/0005davis.htm   Genetic Recombination - Private Papers of Nobel Scientist Joshua Lederberg  Added to "Profiles in Science" Web Site http://www.nih.gov/news/pr/mar99/nlm-02.htm Lederberg won the Nobel Prize in Medicine at age 33 for scientific work
  started at age 20, which showed that bacteria can in fact, reproduce through
  sexual recombination. Although Lederberg was "astonished" to
  receive the prize, his diary entry for October 26, 1958, the day he heard he
  had won it, also records some of his fears: "On the whole I'm a little afraid the fuss and bother
  more than outweigh the egotistic satisfactions, the cash and the prestige
  factors that might help in getting my lab going."   Oil – Thomas Gold * is oil a bacterial byproduct?           Thomas Gold  -- "The Deep
  Hot Bioshpere," http://www.people.cornell.edu/pages/tg21/   The Theory of Unlimited Oil       One Heretic Predicts More Oil to Be Drilled in the Ground By Kevin Newman   --  March 16 http://more.abcnews.go.com/onair/closerlook/wnt_000316_cl_oilheretic_feature.html   The Declaration of Independence http://www.law.emory.edu/FEDERAL/independ/declar.html   Encyclopedia Americana: Bill of Rights http://gi.grolier.com/presidents/ca/side/bilright.html 
 I posted these on 07 Oct 2000   
 
 
 
 
   
 | 
[Disclaimer]      [Site Map]    
[index]  
Piper Creations Purest - not a Puritan
ThePiedPiper
mailto:piper@hot1.net 
or contact 
Laura Lanning~Shipton 
P.O. Box 154344 
Waco, TX 76715 
Copyright © 1999, 2000 Piper Creations
All Rights Reserved. Including the background .gif